When in the large and continuously expanding world of academic publication, your work is known as much of an achievement as your study. The final objective of any scholar is to write in a journal which can be indexed in either of the two prominent bibliographic databases: Web of Science (WoS) or Scopus. These two giants are monopolies that are concerned about entry into a world of scholarly visibility, impact measures and institutional recognition. However, to a novice researcher or even an experienced scholar who is new in the field the question many times comes into view: Which index to use in my paper? This is not a black-and-white decision between the two; WoS and Scopus have different pros and serve slightly different users and researchers. Knowing their pros and cons is important to position your work in the best strategic way. And in the present-day hectic academic environment, it is perhaps more than ever that knowing how to manoeuvre through this terrain effectively is the order of the day.
Clarivate Analytics, the operator of Web of Science (WoS), can be referred to as the original and most prestigious citation index. It dates back to the 1960s when the first attempts to study citation analysis were made by Eugene Garfield. WoS is notorious due to their strict standards of selection, which include high-impact journals, a rigorous and thorough process of evaluation by experts. It is commonly regarded as the gold standard, especially in the natural sciences and engineering, and even in some of the social sciences. Conversely, Scopus, which was released by Elsevier in 2004, soon became a massive rival. It has a more extensive coverage compared to WoS, which seeks a more detailed picture of research output in the world. Although still with a strong quality control, Scopus tends to have a broader coverage of journals, especially in the sciences of the humanities and arts, and also conference proceedings and books.
In terms of coverage and scope, WoS tends to be more discriminative, that is, it is mostly concentrated on the peer-reviewed journals, mainly, English-language publications of reputable publishing houses. Its base collections are very revered yet this selectivity may imply that non-English publications or emerging technologies or regional journals may be underrepresented. Scopus on the other hand boasts of a wider and more comprehensive coverage. It lists considerably more journals including more open-access titles, conference proceedings, and books. It is also more reflected in non-English language journals and research in developing countries. The broader net may come in especially handy with interdisciplinary studies or when areas with worldwide diversity of materials are considered first. Scopus is the breadth winner and WoS curated prestige winner. The two are also different in terms of journal selection criteria. Clarivate utilizes a stringent, multi-dimensional evaluation procedure that takes into account the publication criteria, editorial material, global diversity and reference examination. This procedure has been seen as less transparent yet greatly admired among the academic community and with great attention to quality and impact and long-term contribution to the scholarly record. Although also rather strong, the procedure of Elsevier to include in Scopus is usually regarded as more transparent. The combination of qualitative and quantitative metrics, such as peer review, citation metrics, and editorial board expertise, is used. Although it continues to focus on quality, Scopus could be more open to more recent journals that have high potential. This is a disadvantage since both are stringent. The ones of WoS are more exclusive traditionally whereas the ones of Scopus are more explicit and can be more adaptable.
In metrics and analytics, WoS hosts the Journal Impact Factor (JIF) a fairly well-known (and frequently discussed) metric, published in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). Although not the sole one, JIF can be a major measure of journal prestige and impact. Other indicators such as the h-index of authors and institutions and other counts of citation are also provided by WoS. However, Scopus also offers its own set of metrics which are the CiteScore, SJR (SCImago Journal Rank), and SNIP (Source Normalized Impact per Paper). CiteScore is a more comprehensive measurement that takes into account all types of documents and has a bigger window in comparison with JIF. SJR and SNIP attempt to harmonize subject-field citations and provide a more refined understanding of impact. Scopus also includes h-index of authors and institutions as well as advanced citation follow-up. Scopus is the better in this scenario due to its variety and nuance, whereas WoS is the better due to the conventional JIF. There are also differences in the user interface and functionality. WoS has an effective, though not very user-friendly interface, particularly to new users. It has very granular search functionality with the ability to write complex and narrowed results. It is concentrated on the in-depth analysis of citation networks and specific data retrieval. By comparison, Scopus tends to be a more modern, easier to use interface that is more often easy to navigate. Its search capability is strong, and has decent filtering and display of search results. It is usually applauded for being easy to use in finding the applicable literature and tracing citations. The ease of use will give Scopus the win over WoS, and the advanced search is the win of WoW. This always boils down to individual taste and knowledge.
In academic life, there are a lot of deadlines: grants, promotions, thesis defenses and so on. One big obstacle is a long process of publication. Although both journals catalogued in WoS and the Scopus-database are subject to high-quality peer review, certain journals have a fast-track variant. In this case, a service such as Fast Publication might become a game-changer. What are the reasons why you would want to use a fast-track service to publish? It assists you in winning the race against time as you can change your manuscript into priority so that it passes the peer review and publication path in only a fraction of the time. This is indispensable in keeping deadlines. It is also a source of professional advice, whereby the complicated world of submitting journals can be overwhelming.
Comparing journal prestige versus reach. Publishing in high-impact WoS journals can be a very effective way of improving your academic profile, and may be necessary to gain career advancement in most institutions. Although it does not reduce prestige, Scopus is more widely covered, and your paper may be found by an even greater number of researchers, which may result in even more heterogeneous collaborations and uses. Calculate the targets of your target journals. In case the Journal Impact Factor is a very important factor to you or your institution, concentrate on the WoS journals with high JIFs. When you feel that you would like a larger coverage of the impact, you can use journals that have high CiteScores, SJRs, or SNIP values in Scopus. Also, consider the accessibility since both indices contain articles in open-access journals. Scopus contains open-access titles in particularly large numbers and may make your paper more discovered and read, particularly in case your journal is open-access. And, of course, when you have to get it in a hurry, then this is where you take advantage of a service that specializes in making the process quick. Never sacrifice speed with quality. Rather, collaborate with a professional team who will assist you to specify the correct journals and make your manuscript ready to have it reviewed in a fast-track manner. Fast Publication realizes how urgent your research is and we are committed to ensuring that you get your objectives without compromising on academic integrity.
Finally, the index is not necessarily right. Your selection of the optimal choice of your paper will be based on a combination of factors: your field, purpose of your research, target audience, and features of this particular journal. The point is, in a more conventional scientific discipline and using an institution that values heavily the Journal Impact Factor, the major objective is to be indexed in the Web of Science. Scopus may provide a more suitable and comprehensive platform in case your work is interdisciplinary, in the humanities or arts, and/or enjoys the advantages of a wider international and linguistic scope. The one and the most significant recommendation is that you must research. Find the most appropriate journals to use in your work with the help of both databases, compare their metrics, comprehend the scope of these journals, and select the one that can be best applied in your publication strategy. And in case time is the most important requirement, keep in mind that a strategic partner such as Fast Publication can turn out to be the solution to your research being published in the world, fast and efficiently.
Are you willing to speed up your academic career? Get in touch with our expert team at Contact Fast Publication to find out how our professional team can assist you in getting your research publication in one of the most popular journals within the WoS and Scopus indexes within a fast-track schedule.
