You take months or even years to undertake a rigorous scientific study. You end up writing your manuscript. Next you get the shattering email only a few days later: desk-rejection.
Editors usually reject submission sloughs in haste, often within 3 days. This rush decision doesn’t often reflect on your underlying science. It is a direct quality control measure. To editors, sloppy presentation is a pointer of inadequate scientific rigor.
Such failure at this initial stage is as a result of preventable technical and formatting issues. They do not even pass the peer review stage.
Fast Publications realizes this gatekeeping, which is merciless. We can provide Advanced Formatting Services to remove these technical hazards to get your science reviewed.
Structural Integrity: The Blueprint Violation
All academic journals require authors to use a particular plan in manuscripts. Any minor deviation on this blue print is disastrous.
Ignore IMRAD at Your Peril
Most scientific papers use the strict IMRAD format: Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion.Violations of this format will cause an instant confusion to the editor.
Some journals even customize the standard, possibly placing the Methods section at the end. All these are the specific requirements that you cannot afford not to adhere to in order to fail immediately.
Mechanical Layout Mistakes
Mechanical basics are first checked by the editors. You can expect a typical font like 12-point Times New Roman. They tend to impose the use of a double-spacing and typical one-inch margins.
One of the mistakes that are exact is the running head. In case of a professional paper, the running head needs to be in all-capital font and must not be longer than 50 characters with spaces. Guides of modern style prohibit the old designation Running head: as a whole. Adherence to minor details is an indication of complete professionalism.
Citation Rigor: The Scholarly Base
Citation errors constitute the absence of essential scholarly rigor to editors. These are avoidable mistakes that are systematic.
Inconsistency is Immediate Rejection
You should use the style uniformly, whether it’s APA, MLA, or Chicago. The combination of the rules of the various styles makes the immediate friction on both the reader and the editor.
The Mismatch Problem
Ensure that you list each in-text citation in your reference list, and vice versa. This essential error of mismatch prevents readers from checking your sources.
Additionally, the absence of such persistent identifiers as Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) slows down the process of verification. To determine the validity of your claims, publishers seek such identifiers.
Data Visuals: Technical Fail
As soon as the editors and reviewers review your figures and tables, they will glance at them. They are sure to reject visual faults in technical aspects.
Low Image Resolution
Low-resolution figures often cause technical rejection. The publishers need high-resolution files. The minimum photographic value should be 300 DPI and maximum 600 DPI in the case of line art. Images that are pixelated or blurred are difficult to assessed.
Data Redundancy
Important findings should be emphasized using figures and tables. Do not repeat identical information with a table or a figure that is in the text of the paper. This superfluousness is space-wasting and poor editing.
Ethical Statements: The Intimacy Portal
Ethical compliance statements are also obligatory. The absence of these things causes an immediate integrity breach and immediate desk rejection.
Mandatory Approvals
Your paper needs to declare ethical integrity. In case your research examined human or animal participants you have to state that you used an Institutional Review Board (IRB) or Ethics Committee.
You will also need to publicly disclose all the financial and non-financial Conflicts of Interest (COI). Inability to reveal funding sources provokes great concerns in the journal.
The Data Availability Requirement
You have to have a Data Availability Statement (DAS). This statement is a clarification of where and how the readers can gain access to your supporting data, making science open.
Most of the journals require the DAS to be displayed in the body of the manuscript, usually immediately preceding the References section. Omission or placement of this statement is an indication of lapse in adhering to the developing requirements.
The Language Barrier: The Professionalism Check
The low quality of English used is usually a formatting error. It reduces at once the rigor of the manuscript in the mind of the editor.
The bad writing takes time to the peer reviewers and they are not able to focus on the scientific quality of your work. A study had revealed that 60 percent of manuscripts rejected were rejected because of poor quality of English.
The tone of your manuscript should be formal and analytical and academic. A writing that sounds too complicated, choppy or provocative implies that the paper is not finished and polished.
Protect Your Submission at Fast Publications
The requirements of journals keep on changing. The use of manual preparation creates an intolerable level of risk of technical desk rejection, which costs you months of career momentum.
The solution is offered by Fast Publications. We have Advanced Formatting Services that act as a mandatory shield of compliance. We carefully abide by the most recent journal-specific requirements to your whole submission package.
Fast Publications will ensure that running heads and figure resolution adhere to ethical declaration positions.
End unnecessary administrative breakdowns and wastage of research time. Collaborate with Fast Publications in order to guarantee that your work sneaks through the editorial gate with perfect professional arrogance. Get the shortest route to peer review.
