The aspiration of any researcher is to have a publication in a high Impact Factor (IF) journal. You want the prestige. You seek visibility. Nevertheless, a quest towards a high IF journal without taking note of Fit can take one directly to a desk rejection.
Out of all submitted manuscripts, almost 70 percent are rejected by the editors desk. The reason is that the level of the papers is not in accordance with the scope and the standards of the journal. A desk rejection is a fast “No” without having to go through peer review at all. It wastes months of your precious time.
We provide Special Journal Choice Services at Fast Publications. We assist authors to avoid this publishing trap. Fast Publications steer you to the appropriate place to conduct your research. The most important decision that you make during the publication process is to pick the correct journal.
You should not concentrate on the Impact Factor only. Begin putting the convergence between your research and the mission of the journal first.
Define Your Paper: DNA: Scope and Audience
Define your paper before you open a journal list. You should be able to come up with the main aspects of your study. This is a very essential starting point, which will enable you with good Journal Selection Advice.
Establish Your Scope: What is the research question that you are responding to? Which discipline or sub-discipline is your methodology a part of? Is it a theoretical, empirical, applied or a review article?
Who Will Be Reading this Work? Who will need to read this work in order to advance your field? Is it fellow methodologists, policymakers, or clinicians, or general interdisciplinary audience? The niche audience needs a niche journal. A more general journal could be a better place to have a broader topic.
The DNA in your paper is a filter. It immediately filters journals that do not suit. See what your work does add to the existing knowledge.
Dominance of Fit: Aims and Scope
The most significant aspect to putting off a desk rejection is Journal Fit. This is strictly checked by the editors. They guard the identity of their journal. You need to make a contribution to the current discourse they facilitate.
Look at the Aims and Scope of the Journal: The blueprint of the journal is its Aims and Scope statement. It can be found in the journal site. Read it carefully. Do not just skim the keywords. It outlines the focus of the journal. It outlines the nature of articles published by it.
Review Recently Published Articles: Get past the statement. Read the titles and abstracts of the four or five issues that have been the most recent. Are your approaches, issues, and findings comparable? When you make a reference to a lot of articles on one particular journal, then probably it is a good potential match. These are the steps which are going to verify that your paper is in the ecosystem of that journal. The top cause of desk rejection is a lack of alignment.
Impact Factor: It is a Filter, but Not a Goal
The average number of times that articles are cited within the past 2 years defines the Journal Impact Factor (IF). Researchers cannot disregard this metric. High IF journals hold prestige and gain high visibility. Nevertheless, researchers should use the IF in moderation.
Compare Within Disciplines Only: IF values vary radically between academic disciplines. It is an excellent math factor of 3.0. A cell biology factor of 3.0 can be described as average. You have to compare journals in the same Clarivate subject headings. Use the Quartile Rank (Q1, Q2, etc.). A Q1 journal will be in the top 25 percent of its type.
Avoid Blind Ambition: A specialized journal of a modest IF is preferable to a high-quality general journal when your study makes a robust and innovative contribution to a small niche field. A high-IF journal will probably reject a paper that is too narrow to appeal to its general audience. Even a journal with a lower IF that fits well ensures peer review and publication. Fast Publications promotes relevancy among writers as opposed to pure figures.
Technical Compliance: Do Not Let Them off the Hook
Poor technical execution is also sought by the editors. They desire the justification of instant rejection. You have to get rid of these scapegoats.
Adhere to Instructions for Authors (IFAs): No bargaining here. Read the IFAs thoroughly. Each journal also has its format. They determine the reference style, word count restrictions, figure/table count restrictions, and ethical statements. Lack of respect for journal time of journal is demonstrated through failure to comply. It provides the editor with a defensible reason that he rejects the desk.
Get Manuscript Quality: You should have outstanding grammar and structure in your paper. The methodology should be sound and reasonable. This contribution should be well stated in the abstract and introduction. A messy draft is an indicator of bad research generally. Unless you are a first language English speaker, employ an expert editor.
Advisory Professional Journal Selection
The process of selecting journals is complicated. It goes way beyond getting a high number. It involves thinking strategically and requires a profound understanding of the world of publishing. This requires proper risk evaluation.
Do you not know where to find your multidisciplinary work? And do you not have time to carefully research 15 possible journals? Is your career development path a Q1 journal placement?
Fast Publications offers individualised journal Selective Advice. We evaluate the novelty, procedure and the intended audience of your manuscript. We produce a customised list of journals. An appropriate analysis of Impact Factor, Fit, Review Speed, and Acceptance Rates is available in our service. We will assist you in producing an attractive cover letter that will bring forth the value of your paper to the targeted audience of the journal.
We help you to optimize your acceptance and reduce the risk of desk rejection. Get the right house in your research. Get into successful publication with Contact Fast Publications.
